Moving from Alabama to Illinois: Residency, Taxes, and What to Prove

In Alabama

Alabama's major hospital systems (UAB in Birmingham, Huntsville Hospital) are significant travel-nursing markets. Because Alabama's presumption threshold is a cumulative seven months rather than 183 days, a nurse needs to track total months of Alabama presence across contracts within the tax year against that higher bar, while remembering that maintaining a permanent place of abode in Alabama is a separate condition of the presumption, not an automatic trigger from days alone.

In Illinois

Illinois has no statutory day-count test to trip, so a travel nurse not domiciled in Illinois does not become an Illinois resident merely by crossing a day threshold on a long assignment. What creates exposure instead is the temporary or transitory question and the 100.3020(f) presumptions: an assignment structured as a series of renewals that keeps a nurse in Illinois more than nine months of a year, or more days than in any other state, supports a presumption of residency that must be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence, and the permanent or temporary nature of the work assignment is named in the rule as relevant evidence. The more common Illinois exposure is the reverse pattern, where a nurse claims a Florida or Texas tax home but actually lives in and pays Illinois-area rent for most of the year; Illinois-source wages for days actually worked in Illinois are taxable to any nonresident nurse regardless of claimed tax home.

In Alabama

Alabama has no major-league professional sports franchise, so its jock-tax exposure runs entirely through visiting athletes and, more prominently, college athletics: NIL (name, image, likeness) income earned by student-athletes at Alabama's major programs is Alabama-source income subject to the state's standard individual income tax rates, an increasingly relevant issue as NIL payments have grown.

In Illinois

Illinois taxes nonresident professional athletes on a duty-day basis: Illinois-source income equals total compensation multiplied by the ratio of duty days in Illinois (games, practices, mandatory team functions) to total duty days for the season; mere travel through Illinois without a game or team event does not create a duty day. This applies to visiting teams playing the Bears, Bulls, Blackhawks, White Sox, and Cubs, and Illinois is regarded by practitioners as an aggressive, well-enforced jock-tax state that historically extended the tax reciprocally to any state that taxed Illinois-based athletes.

In Alabama

Alabama's Gulf Coast (Gulf Shores, Orange Beach) draws seasonal visitors, but the seven-month presumption is a materially higher bar than the 183-day rule used in most other states, meaning a snowbird can stay considerably longer in Alabama than they could in a 183-day state before triggering the statutory presumption, though genuine domicile-based residency remains possible even for a shorter stay if the person's conduct shows intent to make Alabama home.

In Illinois

The Illinois snowbird risk runs entirely through the 100.3020(f) presumptions, not through a day threshold. A retiree who keeps the Illinois house and spends more than nine months there risks the nine-month presumption of residency, and a former Illinois resident is presumed to still be one in the following year if present in Illinois more days than in any other state, which is a comparison a snowbird splitting a year can lose well short of any traditional threshold. The favorable counterweight is Cain v. Hamer, 2012 IL App (1st) 112833, where retirees who split time nearly evenly (1,666 Illinois days against 1,700 Florida days across 1996 through 2004) were held nonresidents, with the court weighing nexus evidence such as Florida licenses, voter registration, a Florida declaration of domicile, club spending, and credit card data showing 73% of expenditures and 61% of transactions outside Illinois. Illinois's General Homestead Exemption is a specific cross-check point if a person claims Florida domicile but keeps the Illinois exemption active.

In Alabama

Alabama has no convenience-of-the-employer rule. A remote worker physically performing work from Alabama for an out-of-state employer owes Alabama tax on that Alabama-source income under the state's standard sourcing rules; Alabama's full federal-income-tax deduction can meaningfully soften the effective state tax rate compared to states without that deduction.

In Illinois

Illinois has no convenience-of-the-employer rule. A nonresident who works remotely from another state for an Illinois-based employer is generally not taxed by Illinois on those wages, because Illinois sources employee compensation to where the services are physically performed, not to the employer's location. This makes Illinois meaningfully less sticky for remote workers than New York or a handful of other convenience-rule states.

In Alabama

Alabama follows the federal Servicemembers Civil Relief Act and Military Spouses Residency Relief Act, but its own regulation is notably taxpayer-unfriendly on the presumption side: federal employees and military personnel domiciled in Alabama remain presumptively Alabama residents, taxed on worldwide income, until they affirmatively prove a change of domicile, meaning a permanent change of station alone does not end Alabama tax residency without proof of genuine domicile abandonment. Alabama fully exempts military retirement pay from state income tax, a significant draw for the state's sizable veteran population given its bases (Redstone Arsenal, Maxwell-Gunter, Fort Novosel).

In Illinois

Illinois follows the federal Servicemembers Civil Relief Act and Military Spouses Residency Relief Act. A servicemember whose home of record is Illinois remains an Illinois domiciliary for tax purposes regardless of duty station unless they take affirmative steps to change domicile, while a servicemember stationed in Illinois on orders, and their qualifying spouse, does not become an Illinois resident solely because of the posting, and military pay is not Illinois-source income for a nonresident servicemember stationed there.

In Alabama

Alabama has a smaller commercial airline crew base than its neighbors, concentrated around Birmingham-Shuttlesworth. Federal law (49 U.S.C. § 40116) limits state taxation of air carrier employees to their state of residence and, narrowly, a state where more than 50% of pay is earned; crew domiciled in Alabama are taxed on their full wages under the state's standard resident rules.

In Illinois

Federal law (49 U.S.C. §40116) limits states to taxing airline employee compensation only in the employee's state of residence and any state where more than 50% of pay is earned. This protects flight crew based at O'Hare or Midway who are domiciled outside Illinois from having their full compensation pulled into Illinois taxation solely because their duty station is in Illinois.