Moving from Alaska to New Hampshire: Residency, Taxes, and What to Prove

In Alaska

Alaska is a genuine travel-nursing destination (Anchorage, Fairbanks, and rural hub hospitals pay premium rates for remote-area coverage), but since Alaska has no income tax, a travel nurse working an Alaska contract owes no Alaska state tax on those wages regardless of tax-home status elsewhere. The only residency question that matters here is whether a nurse who relocates to Alaska long-term wants to pursue PFD eligibility, which requires a full prior calendar year of residency and is generally not realistic for someone on a series of short travel contracts.

In New Hampshire

New Hampshire has no state income tax to complicate a travel nurse's tax-home analysis, which makes it an attractive tax-home state to claim, similar to Florida or Texas, provided the nurse genuinely maintains and returns to a New Hampshire home between assignments under the general IRS tax-home rules (Publication 463). New Hampshire itself publishes no nurse-specific guidance because it has no individual filing requirement to trigger one.

In Alaska

Alaska has no major professional sports franchises subject to jock-tax duty-day apportionment, and because the state has no income tax, it could not impose one on visiting athletes even if a franchise existed. This is a non-issue for Alaska.

In New Hampshire

New Hampshire has no major professional sports franchises, so it runs no state jock-tax regime of its own, and because it has no income tax, a New Hampshire-domiciled athlete owes zero state tax on the share of income attributable to New Hampshire duty days, unlike a player based in a state that both taxes and credits.

In Alaska

Alaska's snowbird dynamic runs in reverse from Sun Belt states: Alaskans who winter in Arizona, Hawaii, or the Lower 48 to escape the cold risk crossing the 180-day cumulative absence threshold for PFD eligibility if that time away is not documented against an allowable absence category, since 'wanted warmer weather' is not itself one of the enumerated exceptions. A long-term visitor to Alaska who is not actually relocating does not become an Alaska resident by physical presence alone, since PFD eligibility requires the pre-January-1 affirmative-step evidence and a full qualifying calendar year of residency, not just time spent in the state.

In New Hampshire

New Hampshire places no day-count cap on long visitors of its own, since it has no statutory residency test. The exposure runs entirely the other way: someone who claims New Hampshire domicile to escape a high-tax origin state (most commonly Massachusetts) but still spends significant time and keeps a home in that origin state can be taxed there as a statutory resident regardless of the New Hampshire claim.

In Alaska

A remote worker who physically relocates to Alaska and works for an out-of-state employer owes no Alaska tax on those wages, since there is nothing to tax; the employer's home state may still apply its own convenience-of-employer rule to the arrangement, so the exposure runs entirely through the other state's rules, not Alaska's. Alaska residency itself, separate from the tax question, only matters here if the worker also wants PFD eligibility, which layers on the year-long residency and intent requirements above.

In New Hampshire

New Hampshire has no convenience-of-the-employer rule (it has nothing to source, having no income tax). The real friction runs the other direction: a remote worker who moves to New Hampshire but keeps a Massachusetts-based employer needs to confirm Massachusetts is not still asserting Massachusetts-source treatment of the wages under its own COVID-era sourcing rules, which New Hampshire itself challenged (unsuccessfully, at the Supreme Court) on behalf of its residents in 2020-2021.

In Alaska

Alaska hosts significant active-duty populations (JBER, Eielson AFB, Fort Wainwright), and follows the federal Servicemembers Civil Relief Act and Military Spouses Residency Relief Act: a servicemember stationed in Alaska on orders does not become an Alaska domiciliary solely because of the posting. Separately, active duty military service is one of the PFD's specifically allowed absence categories, so an Alaska-resident servicemember posted outside the state on orders does not lose PFD eligibility for that absence, and a nonresident servicemember stationed in Alaska on orders generally cannot claim PFD residency based on the posting alone.

In New Hampshire

New Hampshire follows the federal SCRA and MSRRA: a service member's home-of-record does not change solely because military orders station them in New Hampshire, and an accompanying spouse can generally elect the service member's domicile state under MSRRA. Because New Hampshire taxes no individual income, choosing it as home-of-record eliminates state income tax on military pay entirely.

In Alaska

Federal law (49 U.S.C. § 40116) limits state taxation of air carrier employees to their state of residence, which is moot for Alaska-domiciled crew since Alaska has no income tax to apply to any portion of their wages regardless of where flight time is flown.

In New Hampshire

New Hampshire has no major hub airport for airline crew, but the federal carve-out (49 U.S.C. § 40116, taxing crew wages only in the state of residence or a state where over 50% of pay is earned) combined with New Hampshire's lack of any income tax makes it, like Florida and Texas, a common domicile choice for crew based at nearby Boston Logan who want to avoid Massachusetts income tax on their wages.