Moving from California to Ohio: Residency, Taxes, and What to Prove

In California

California is both a major origin state, since many nurses domiciled here take travel contracts elsewhere, and the single highest-paying destination state for travel assignments. A nurse's tax home must be a genuine, regularly-returned-to residence with duplicated living expenses; nurses who claim a tax home in Texas or Florida but never actually go back risk having the FTB or IRS reclassify housing stipends as taxable wages if the facts show California, not the claimed state, is really home. A nurse domiciled outside California who works a temporary California assignment as a W-2 traveler does not become a California resident from that assignment alone, but the wages earned during the California contract are still California-source and must be reported on a nonresident Form 540NR.

In Ohio

Ohio has no separate statutory carve-out for travel nurses; a nurse on assignment is measured under the same contact-period and bright-line rules as anyone else. The recurring problem practitioners flag nationally, and one that shows up in Ohio specifically, is a nurse who claims a Florida or Texas tax home on paper but actually lives in an Ohio rental apartment for most of the year and rarely if ever visits the claimed home state; that pattern has drawn audits that disallow the out-of-state tax home entirely, which exposes the tax-free travel stipends to tax and typically requires filing an Ohio resident return plus nonresident returns in every other state worked.

In California

California is the most aggressive jock-tax state. FTB counts not just game days but practices, walkthroughs, and even voluntary workouts held at a California team facility during game week, which can turn one road game into three or four California duty days. With the Lakers, Clippers, Warriors, Kings, 49ers, Rams, Chargers, Dodgers, Giants, Padres, and Athletics all based here, nonresident athletes playing any California team face California nonresident tax on their duty-day-apportioned income, while California-domiciled athletes owe California tax on their full worldwide income.

In Ohio

Ohio cities apply municipal jock taxes to visiting professional athletes, but the method changed after the Ohio Supreme Court's 2015 Hillenmeyer decision. Cleveland had taxed visiting players using a games-played method, which the court struck down as a due process violation; municipalities must now use a duty-days method that allocates income based on the ratio of days worked in the city (games, practices, mandatory team activities) to total duty days for the season. This affects visiting teams playing the Browns, Bengals, Guardians, Reds, Cavaliers, and Blue Jackets, and it also applies to those home franchises' own players when Ohio is their tax home.

In California

The nine-month presumption under §17016 only creates a rebuttable presumption of residency past that point; it does not create a safe harbor below it. Spending fewer than nine months in California does not guarantee nonresidency; FTB still applies the closest-connections test. This is the classic dual-home audit target described across Bogleheads and r/tax threads: a retiree who keeps the California house, splits time with a Nevada or Arizona property, but leaves a spouse, kids, doctors, or the majority of actual annual days in California.

In Ohio

The Ohio-specific snowbird scenario is a retiree or seasonal resident who keeps an Ohio home while wintering in Florida or another warm-weather state. If that person keeps their contact periods under 213 for the full year, maintains a genuine abode outside Ohio, gives up the Ohio driver's license, does not claim the Ohio homestead exemption, and files Form IT NRS by October 15, they qualify for the irrebuttable nonresident presumption regardless of how nice the Ohio house is. Miss any one of those five conditions and the state falls back to the narrower facts-and-circumstances domicile factors under the 2026 version of OAC 5703-7-16.

In California

California has no convenience-of-employer rule like New York's. A nonresident who physically performs all their work outside California for a California-headquartered employer is not California-taxed on those wages solely because the employer is based here. The trigger is the employee's own residency and physical work location, not the employer's address. A California resident, however, owes California tax on remote wages regardless of where the employer sits.

In Ohio

Ohio has no state-level convenience-of-the-employer rule. The practical issue for remote workers is municipal: under the 20-day occasional entrant rule, an employer withholds to the employee's principal place of work until the employee exceeds 20 days working in a different Ohio municipality, at which point withholding must shift to that city. Ohio law also recognizes a 'qualifying remote work location,' which can be an employee's home, for sourcing municipal tax when the employee works primarily from home rather than a traditional office.

In California

California follows the federal Servicemembers Civil Relief Act and the Military Spouses Residency Relief Act. Active-duty military domiciled outside California but stationed here under orders are not California residents and their military pay isn't California-taxed. Under MSRRA and the Veterans Benefits and Transition Act, a nonmilitary spouse can elect the servicemember's domicile for state tax purposes instead of being pulled into California residency by physical presence alone.

In Ohio

Ohio follows the federal Servicemembers Civil Relief Act: a servicemember whose home of record is Ohio remains an Ohio domiciliary and taxpayer regardless of where military orders station them, and a nonresident servicemember stationed in Ohio on orders is not taxed by Ohio on military pay solely because of the duty station. Since the 2023 tax year, the Military Spouses Residency Relief Act as amended lets a military spouse elect to use the servicemember's state of legal residence for state tax purposes, giving military couples more flexibility than a strict duty-station rule would allow.

In California

Federal law (49 U.S.C. §40116) limits taxation of air carrier employees to their state of residence and any state where they earn more than 50% of their pay, overriding ordinary duty-day sourcing. California hosts major crew bases at LAX and SFO, so this carve-out matters heavily for California-based flight crew who fly national or international routes.

In Ohio

Federal law (49 U.S.C. §40116) limits any state to taxing an air carrier employee's compensation only in the employee's state of residence and any state where more than 50% of pay is earned. This protects flight crew based out of Ohio hubs such as Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky (CVG) or Columbus who are domiciled in another state from having their full income pulled into Ohio taxation solely because Ohio is their duty station.