Moving from Florida to Texas: Residency, Taxes, and What to Prove

In Florida

Florida is the most common 'tax home' state travel nurses claim to receive tax-free stipends, but IRS and state auditors have disallowed Florida tax-home claims for nurses who kept a Florida address on paper while actually living year-round in Ohio or another assignment-state rental and never returning to Florida. To hold up, the nurse needs to actually maintain and return to the Florida home between assignments, keep paying for it continuously, and hold Florida driver's license, voter registration, and vehicle registration, not just a mailing address.

In Texas

Because Texas has no income tax, it is one of the most common states travel nurses claim as a tax home, since no Texas return is ever required regardless of how assignment income is sourced. The exposure isn't with Texas, it's federal and multi-state: the IRS still requires a genuine tax home, a Texas residence the nurse pays to maintain and returns to, to justify tax-free stipends under the duplicate-expense logic in IRS Publication 463, and any income-tax state where the nurse actually works still requires a nonresident return on wages earned there regardless of claimed Texas residency.

In Florida

Florida is home to the Miami Heat, Miami Dolphins, Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Tampa Bay Lightning, Florida Panthers, Orlando Magic, Miami Marlins, and Tampa Bay Rays. Players on these teams owe zero state tax on the roughly half of duty days spent in Florida, but every state jock tax on duty days in taxing states (California, New York, etc.) still applies in full, and because Florida has no income tax, there is no Florida credit to offset those away-state bills, unlike a player based in a state that both taxes and grants an out-of-state tax credit.

In Texas

Texas is home to the Cowboys, Texans, Mavericks, Rockets, Spurs, Rangers, and Astros, and because Texas has no income tax, athletes domiciled here owe no state tax on their home-team salary, only on the 'duty days' spent playing in states that run a jock tax on visiting players. That asymmetry makes Texas domicile a common tax-planning choice among professional athletes generally, not only those on Texas rosters.

In Florida

Florida itself places no day-count cap on how long a part-year resident can be in-state; the exposure runs the other direction; the origin state (New York, Connecticut, New Jersey) is the one counting days and evaluating whether the Florida home is a genuine primary residence or a seasonal one. A Florida-domiciled snowbird who spends more than 183 days in New York, with a permanent place of abode there, can still be taxed as a New York statutory resident despite the Florida homestead and driver's license.

In Texas

Because there is no income-tax day count to trip, long-term visitors and part-year residents face none of the 183-day exposure that drives snowbird planning in New York or California. Texas is instead a destination snowbirds and RVers domicile through, using a homestead or a mail-forwarding domicile service, precisely because spending months elsewhere creates no Texas tax consequence to manage.

In Florida

Florida has no convenience-of-the-employer rule and nothing to reciprocate, since it has no income tax to source wages against. The risk for a remote worker moving to Florida is entirely on the origin-state side: if the employer is based in New York and treats the employee as still NY-sourced under NY's convenience rule, the worker can owe New York tax on Florida-earned wages regardless of Florida residency.

In Texas

No convenience-of-the-employer rule and no income tax mean a genuine Texas remote worker owes Texas nothing on wages, regardless of where the employer is headquartered. The real risk sits with the employer's state: a remote worker may still owe tax elsewhere for days physically worked from an out-of-state office or HQ, a pattern several high-tax states actively audit for among employees who claim to have relocated to Texas.

In Florida

Florida follows the federal Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA) and Military Spouses Residency Relief Act (MSRRA): a servicemember's home-of-record state of legal residence does not change solely due to military orders stationing them in Florida, and a spouse can generally elect the servicemember's domicile state under MSRRA. Because Florida has no income tax, choosing Florida as home-of-record eliminates state income tax on military pay entirely, which is why Florida is a common home-of-record choice among active-duty service members.

In Texas

Texas has no income tax, so service members who claim Texas as home of record owe no state tax on military pay regardless of where they're stationed, making it one of the most popular home-of-record choices in the military. Nonmilitary spouses covered under the Military Spouses Residency Relief Act can elect Texas as their tax domicile alongside the servicemember, which likewise means no state tax on the spouse's income.

In Florida

Federal law (49 U.S.C. § 40116) restricts states from taxing air carrier employees' wages except by their state of residence and, in limited cases, the state where they earn more than 50% of their pay. Because Florida has no income tax, crew members domiciled in Florida owe no state tax on their airline wages regardless of how their duty time is split, which is why Florida (along with Texas) is a common domicile choice for pilots and flight attendants based in Miami, Fort Lauderdale, or Orlando.

In Texas

DFW and IAH are major hub crew bases for American Airlines and United, and Dallas Love Field is Southwest's headquarters, making Texas domicile attractive for flight crew under the federal Mobile Workforce carve-out for air carrier employees (49 U.S.C. Sec. 40116), which limits state income tax on a crew member's pay to their state of residence plus any state where they earn more than 50% of their compensation. A Texas-domiciled crew member who never crosses that 50% threshold elsewhere owes no state tax on flight pay at all.