Moving from New Hampshire to Georgia: Residency, Taxes, and What to Prove

In New Hampshire

New Hampshire has no state income tax to complicate a travel nurse's tax-home analysis, which makes it an attractive tax-home state to claim, similar to Florida or Texas, provided the nurse genuinely maintains and returns to a New Hampshire home between assignments under the general IRS tax-home rules (Publication 463). New Hampshire itself publishes no nurse-specific guidance because it has no individual filing requirement to trigger one.

In Georgia

Georgia is a large travel-nursing assignment market (Atlanta, Augusta, Savannah systems), so travel nurses working Georgia contracts need to track Georgia days against the 183-day aggregate test if Georgia is not their claimed tax home; a nurse who works consecutive Georgia contracts can inadvertently cross 183 days in a rolling 365-day window and become a Georgia taxable resident even while maintaining a tax home elsewhere.

In New Hampshire

New Hampshire has no major professional sports franchises, so it runs no state jock-tax regime of its own, and because it has no income tax, a New Hampshire-domiciled athlete owes zero state tax on the share of income attributable to New Hampshire duty days, unlike a player based in a state that both taxes and credits.

In Georgia

Atlanta is home to the Braves (MLB), Falcons (NFL), Hawks (NBA), and Atlanta United (MLS); visiting players on these teams' opponents owe Georgia nonresident tax apportioned by duty days spent in Georgia for games, practices, and team activities, following the standard multistate jock-tax duty-day framework used across the major leagues. Georgia-based players are taxed on their full income under the state's flat 4.99% rate, with credits for tax paid to other states on away-game income.

In New Hampshire

New Hampshire places no day-count cap on long visitors of its own, since it has no statutory residency test. The exposure runs entirely the other way: someone who claims New Hampshire domicile to escape a high-tax origin state (most commonly Massachusetts) but still spends significant time and keeps a home in that origin state can be taxed there as a statutory resident regardless of the New Hampshire claim.

In Georgia

Georgia's climate and cost of living pull snowbirds from colder high-tax states, but the 183-day aggregate rule is unforgiving: a part-year visitor who spends more than 183 days or part-days in Georgia within a trailing 365-day period is taxed as a full Georgia resident regardless of stated domicile elsewhere, which is the opposite direction of the more commonly discussed New York or California statutory-resident traps but works on the same day-count mechanics.

In New Hampshire

New Hampshire has no convenience-of-the-employer rule (it has nothing to source, having no income tax). The real friction runs the other direction: a remote worker who moves to New Hampshire but keeps a Massachusetts-based employer needs to confirm Massachusetts is not still asserting Massachusetts-source treatment of the wages under its own COVID-era sourcing rules, which New Hampshire itself challenged (unsuccessfully, at the Supreme Court) on behalf of its residents in 2020-2021.

In Georgia

Georgia has no convenience-of-the-employer rule; a remote worker physically performing work from Georgia for an out-of-state employer generally owes Georgia tax on that Georgia-source income regardless of where the employer is headquartered, and does not owe the employer's home state tax on those same wages absent that state's own convenience rule (which is why Georgia arrivals from convenience-rule states like New York need to watch their employer's withholding treatment closely).

In New Hampshire

New Hampshire follows the federal SCRA and MSRRA: a service member's home-of-record does not change solely because military orders station them in New Hampshire, and an accompanying spouse can generally elect the service member's domicile state under MSRRA. Because New Hampshire taxes no individual income, choosing it as home-of-record eliminates state income tax on military pay entirely.

In Georgia

Georgia follows the federal Servicemembers Civil Relief Act and Military Spouses Residency Relief Act: a servicemember stationed in Georgia on orders does not become a Georgia domiciliary solely because of the posting, and an MSRRA-eligible spouse can generally retain the servicemember's state of legal residence. Georgia also exempts military retirement income from state tax for many veterans under age-based provisions layered on top of the general retirement income exclusion.

In New Hampshire

New Hampshire has no major hub airport for airline crew, but the federal carve-out (49 U.S.C. § 40116, taxing crew wages only in the state of residence or a state where over 50% of pay is earned) combined with New Hampshire's lack of any income tax makes it, like Florida and Texas, a common domicile choice for crew based at nearby Boston Logan who want to avoid Massachusetts income tax on their wages.

In Georgia

Atlanta's Hartsfield-Jackson is Delta Air Lines' largest hub, so Georgia has a large resident and commuting airline-crew population. Federal law (49 U.S.C. § 40116) limits state taxation of air carrier employees to their state of residence and, in narrow cases, a state where they earn more than 50% of pay; crew domiciled in Georgia are taxed on their full wages at Georgia's flat rate regardless of how their flight time is distributed across other states.