Moving from Washington to Texas: Residency, Taxes, and What to Prove

In Washington

Seattle-area hospital systems are a major travel nursing market. Because Washington has no general wage income tax, a genuine Washington tax home creates no state income tax exposure on stipends or wages earned in Washington, though nurses still owe nonresident tax in every other income-tax state where they take assignments. The same tax-home substantiation rules apply: an actual, regularly used residence with duplicated living expenses, not just a mailing address.

In Texas

Because Texas has no income tax, it is one of the most common states travel nurses claim as a tax home, since no Texas return is ever required regardless of how assignment income is sourced. The exposure isn't with Texas, it's federal and multi-state: the IRS still requires a genuine tax home, a Texas residence the nurse pays to maintain and returns to, to justify tax-free stipends under the duplicate-expense logic in IRS Publication 463, and any income-tax state where the nurse actually works still requires a nonresident return on wages earned there regardless of claimed Texas residency.

In Washington

The Seahawks, Mariners, Sounders, and Kraken are all based in Washington, and for decades Washington's lack of a personal income tax made contracts here worth more after-tax than identical contracts in California or New York, since athletes owed no state tax on the home-state portion of their income. That advantage has a hidden cost: because Washington historically had no income tax, athletes domiciled here got no tax credit to offset the jock tax other states charged them for road games, making those out-of-state payments a pure additional cost rather than an offset against home-state liability. The 2028 Millionaires' Tax will itself begin reaching a portion of highly paid athletes' income domiciled in Washington.

In Texas

Texas is home to the Cowboys, Texans, Mavericks, Rockets, Spurs, Rangers, and Astros, and because Texas has no income tax, athletes domiciled here owe no state tax on their home-team salary, only on the 'duty days' spent playing in states that run a jock tax on visiting players. That asymmetry makes Texas domicile a common tax-planning choice among professional athletes generally, not only those on Texas rosters.

In Washington

The relevant test for a long-term visitor isn't Washington's general tax system, since there is none for ordinary wages, but the 183-day physical-presence-plus-abode test and the 30-day safe harbor under the capital gains excise tax. Someone who keeps a Washington vacation home and visits often needs to track their day count carefully if they have appreciated stock or other intangible property they might sell, since crossing 183 days while maintaining a Washington abode can make them a Washington resident for that tax even without ever forming domiciliary intent.

In Texas

Because there is no income-tax day count to trip, long-term visitors and part-year residents face none of the 183-day exposure that drives snowbird planning in New York or California. Texas is instead a destination snowbirds and RVers domicile through, using a homestead or a mail-forwarding domicile service, precisely because spending months elsewhere creates no Texas tax consequence to manage.

In Washington

Washington has no convenience-of-employer rule and, until 2028, no general wage income tax at all, making it one of the most attractive states for remote workers regardless of where their employer is based. The capital gains excise tax and the incoming Millionaires' Tax are the only state-level income taxes that reach a remote worker's earnings, and both turn primarily on domicile rather than employer location.

In Texas

No convenience-of-the-employer rule and no income tax mean a genuine Texas remote worker owes Texas nothing on wages, regardless of where the employer is headquartered. The real risk sits with the employer's state: a remote worker may still owe tax elsewhere for days physically worked from an out-of-state office or HQ, a pattern several high-tax states actively audit for among employees who claim to have relocated to Texas.

In Washington

Washington follows the federal Servicemembers Civil Relief Act and Military Spouses Residency Relief Act. Naval Base Kitsap and Joint Base Lewis-McChord are major installations, and because Washington has no general wage income tax, service members and spouses electing Washington domicile under MSRRA owe no state tax on military pay or spousal wage income today.

In Texas

Texas has no income tax, so service members who claim Texas as home of record owe no state tax on military pay regardless of where they're stationed, making it one of the most popular home-of-record choices in the military. Nonmilitary spouses covered under the Military Spouses Residency Relief Act can elect Texas as their tax domicile alongside the servicemember, which likewise means no state tax on the spouse's income.

In Washington

Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (SEA) is a major hub and crew base for Alaska Airlines and Delta. Federal law (49 U.S.C. §40116) limits taxation of air carrier employees to their state of residence and any state where they earn more than 50% of pay; because Washington has no general wage income tax, Washington-based crew owe no state tax on their wages today regardless of this federal carve-out, though the 2028 Millionaires' Tax may eventually intersect with it for the highest earners.

In Texas

DFW and IAH are major hub crew bases for American Airlines and United, and Dallas Love Field is Southwest's headquarters, making Texas domicile attractive for flight crew under the federal Mobile Workforce carve-out for air carrier employees (49 U.S.C. Sec. 40116), which limits state income tax on a crew member's pay to their state of residence plus any state where they earn more than 50% of their compensation. A Texas-domiciled crew member who never crosses that 50% threshold elsewhere owes no state tax on flight pay at all.