Moving from Michigan to Montana: Residency, Taxes, and What to Prove

In Michigan

Michigan applies its ordinary domicile and 183-day deeming rule to a travel nurse the same as anyone else: a nurse who lives in Michigan at least 183 days in a tax year is statutorily deemed a Michigan domiciliary regardless of a claimed out-of-state tax home. The more frequent exposure runs the other way, where a nurse claims a Florida or Texas tax home while actually renting in Michigan for most of an assignment; Michigan and, where applicable, a Michigan city both tax nonresident wages for days actually worked in the jurisdiction regardless of the claimed tax home.

In Montana

Billings, Missoula, and Montana's regional hospital systems generate real but modest travel-nurse demand given the state's population. A nurse genuinely domiciled in Montana who takes Montana contracts is taxed as an ordinary resident. A nurse claiming a Montana tax home while working elsewhere needs a real, regularly used, duplicated-expense Montana residence, since Montana's facts-and-circumstances domicile standard applies the same evidentiary weight to a claimed tax home as it does to any other domicile dispute.

In Michigan

Michigan and the City of Detroit both tax nonresident professional athletes on a duty-day basis. Detroit's jock tax, formally codified in 2017, applies its duty-day apportionment broadly, reaching injured players who travel with the team as well as coaches, trainers, and other team personnel required to travel and perform services, not just players who take the field. This applies to visiting teams playing the Lions, Pistons, Tigers, and Red Wings.

In Montana

Montana has no major professional franchise in the four big US leagues, so jock-tax exposure runs primarily one direction: Montana-domiciled athletes playing professionally elsewhere are taxed by those other states under their own apportionment rules, while nonresident athletes competing in occasional Montana events (college sports revenue aside) owe Montana tax on Montana-source income under standard nonresident sourcing.

In Michigan

The Michigan snowbird risk runs directly through the Principal Residence Exemption and the 183-day deeming rule together. Campbell v. Department of Treasury shows that simply acquiring a second home in a state like Arizona, without more, was enough for Treasury to deny the PRE on the Michigan home for the following tax year, and Treasury's three-year lookback on PRE claims means a snowbird's arrangement gets checked retroactively, not just going forward. Separately, spending at least 183 days in Michigan in a year, even a retiree splitting time between an Up North cottage and Florida, statutorily deems that person a Michigan domiciliary for the year.

In Montana

Because Montana's permanent-place-of-abode test has no codified day-count threshold, a long-term visitor or second-home owner in a resort area like Whitefish, Big Sky, or the Flathead Valley cannot rely on staying under a specific number of days the way they could in a state with a 183-day rule; the Department instead weighs the full facts and circumstances of how the home is used and how much time is actually spent there. Montana's own domiciliaries who winter in Arizona or elsewhere remain presumed Montana residents under the 'residence cannot be lost until another is gained' rule unless they affirmatively establish a new domicile.

In Michigan

Michigan has no convenience-of-the-employer rule at the state level. A nonresident who works remotely from another state for a Michigan-based employer is generally not taxed by Michigan on those wages, since the state sources employee compensation to where work is physically performed rather than to the employer's location; the same principle generally applies to Michigan's local city income taxes.

In Montana

Montana has no convenience-of-employer rule: a nonresident performing all work physically outside Montana for a Montana-based employer is not Montana-taxed on those wages. Montana, particularly Bozeman, Missoula, and the Flathead Valley around Whitefish and Kalispell, has drawn a wave of remote workers relocating from higher-cost states since 2020, and the lack of a sales tax is a frequently cited draw alongside the income tax simplification.

In Michigan

Michigan follows the federal Servicemembers Civil Relief Act and Military Spouses Residency Relief Act. A servicemember whose domicile was Michigan before entering service remains a Michigan domiciliary regardless of duty station unless they affirmatively establish a new domicile, while a servicemember stationed in Michigan on orders, and a qualifying spouse, does not become a Michigan resident solely because of the posting.

In Montana

Montana follows the federal Servicemembers Civil Relief Act and Military Spouses Residency Relief Act. A service member stationed in Montana under orders (Malmstrom Air Force Base near Great Falls is the state's major installation) does not become Montana-domiciled from the posting alone. Montana's 2024 tax simplification added a subtraction for certain resident working military retirees and military survivor-benefit recipients, on top of the general federal SCRA/MSRRA protections.

In Michigan

Federal law (49 U.S.C. §40116) limits states to taxing airline employee compensation only in the employee's state of residence and any state where more than 50% of pay is earned, protecting flight crew based at Detroit Metro who are domiciled outside Michigan from full-income Michigan taxation based solely on their duty station.

In Montana

Montana's airports (Bozeman Yellowstone International being the busiest) are not major airline crew bases, so the more relevant federal carve-out for Montana residents working in transportation is the interstate rail and motor carrier employee rule: federal law limits taxation of such employees with regularly assigned duties in more than one state to their state of residence.