Moving from Michigan to U.S. Virgin Islands: Residency, Taxes, and What to Prove

In Michigan

Michigan applies its ordinary domicile and 183-day deeming rule to a travel nurse the same as anyone else: a nurse who lives in Michigan at least 183 days in a tax year is statutorily deemed a Michigan domiciliary regardless of a claimed out-of-state tax home. The more frequent exposure runs the other way, where a nurse claims a Florida or Texas tax home while actually renting in Michigan for most of an assignment; Michigan and, where applicable, a Michigan city both tax nonresident wages for days actually worked in the jurisdiction regardless of the claimed tax home.

In U.S. Virgin Islands

The USVI is not a major travel-nurse assignment hub, but the federal tax-home analysis applies identically: a nurse claiming a USVI tax home for stipend purposes must genuinely maintain and return to a USVI home between mainland assignments, not simply hold a mailing address there, or risk having both the stipend tax-home claim and any bona fide residency position challenged together.

In Michigan

Michigan and the City of Detroit both tax nonresident professional athletes on a duty-day basis. Detroit's jock tax, formally codified in 2017, applies its duty-day apportionment broadly, reaching injured players who travel with the team as well as coaches, trainers, and other team personnel required to travel and perform services, not just players who take the field. This applies to visiting teams playing the Lions, Pistons, Tigers, and Red Wings.

In U.S. Virgin Islands

No major U.S. professional sports franchise is based in the USVI, so there is no home-team jock-tax apportionment regime. Visiting athletes competing in USVI-based events or exhibitions owe USVI-source tax on income attributable to duty days physically worked in the territory under the mirrored federal withholding framework administered by BIR.

In Michigan

The Michigan snowbird risk runs directly through the Principal Residence Exemption and the 183-day deeming rule together. Campbell v. Department of Treasury shows that simply acquiring a second home in a state like Arizona, without more, was enough for Treasury to deny the PRE on the Michigan home for the following tax year, and Treasury's three-year lookback on PRE claims means a snowbird's arrangement gets checked retroactively, not just going forward. Separately, spending at least 183 days in Michigan in a year, even a retiree splitting time between an Up North cottage and Florida, statutorily deems that person a Michigan domiciliary for the year.

In U.S. Virgin Islands

A mainland resident who buys a USVI vacation property and spends significant time there while keeping a permanent mainland home is the classic closer-connection failure pattern; Vento illustrates exactly this dynamic, where family members with the same island property and similar day counts reached different residency outcomes because their individual ties to the mainland differed. Simply hitting a day-count threshold is not enough if family, banking, and business remain mainland-centered.

In Michigan

Michigan has no convenience-of-the-employer rule at the state level. A nonresident who works remotely from another state for a Michigan-based employer is generally not taxed by Michigan on those wages, since the state sources employee compensation to where work is physically performed rather than to the employer's location; the same principle generally applies to Michigan's local city income taxes.

In U.S. Virgin Islands

The USVI has no convenience-of-the-employer rule of its own, but a mainland employer's own state convenience rule can still reach a USVI-based remote worker's wages if the employer continues to treat them as sourced to the mainland office. This is a real friction point because most mainland payroll systems are not set up to withhold for BIR, and getting an employer to correctly register and withhold for the USVI is often the first practical obstacle for a new remote-worker resident.

In Michigan

Michigan follows the federal Servicemembers Civil Relief Act and Military Spouses Residency Relief Act. A servicemember whose domicile was Michigan before entering service remains a Michigan domiciliary regardless of duty station unless they affirmatively establish a new domicile, while a servicemember stationed in Michigan on orders, and a qualifying spouse, does not become a Michigan resident solely because of the posting.

In U.S. Virgin Islands

The USVI follows the federal Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA) and Military Spouses Residency Relief Act (MSRRA): a servicemember's home-of-record does not change solely because of orders stationing them in the USVI, and a civilian spouse can elect to keep the servicemember's tax residence when relocating under military orders. A servicemember who qualified as a bona fide USVI resident in an earlier year does not lose that status due to an absence in compliance with military orders, but merely being stationed there under orders does not itself create bona fide residency.

In Michigan

Federal law (49 U.S.C. §40116) limits states to taxing airline employee compensation only in the employee's state of residence and any state where more than 50% of pay is earned, protecting flight crew based at Detroit Metro who are domiciled outside Michigan from full-income Michigan taxation based solely on their duty station.

In U.S. Virgin Islands

The federal carve-out at 49 U.S.C. section 40116, which limits taxation of air carrier employees to their state or territory of residence and, in limited cases, a jurisdiction where they earn more than half their pay, applies to the USVI the same way it applies to the 50 states. Crew who are bona fide USVI residents owe USVI tax on their wages under the mirrored federal framework rather than IRS tax on USVI-source pay.