Moving from South Carolina to New Hampshire: Residency, Taxes, and What to Prove

In South Carolina

South Carolina's large hospital systems (MUSC in Charleston, Prisma Health, McLeod) make it a significant travel-nurse assignment market. Because South Carolina has no day-count residency trigger, a nurse working consecutive South Carolina contracts is not automatically pulled into residency the way they would be in a 183-day state; the exposure runs through South Carolina's domicile test instead, meaning a nurse who buys a home, registers to vote, or otherwise shows intent to make South Carolina permanent can become domiciled regardless of the nominal 'tax home' claimed elsewhere.

In New Hampshire

New Hampshire has no state income tax to complicate a travel nurse's tax-home analysis, which makes it an attractive tax-home state to claim, similar to Florida or Texas, provided the nurse genuinely maintains and returns to a New Hampshire home between assignments under the general IRS tax-home rules (Publication 463). New Hampshire itself publishes no nurse-specific guidance because it has no individual filing requirement to trigger one.

In South Carolina

Charleston and Greenville host minor-league and college sports rather than a major-league franchise, so South Carolina's jock-tax exposure is almost entirely on the visiting-player side: nonresident athletes on teams playing in South Carolina owe apportioned South Carolina tax on the personal-service income allocated to South Carolina duty days, following the state's general rule taxing nonresidents on South Carolina-source personal service income.

In New Hampshire

New Hampshire has no major professional sports franchises, so it runs no state jock-tax regime of its own, and because it has no income tax, a New Hampshire-domiciled athlete owes zero state tax on the share of income attributable to New Hampshire duty days, unlike a player based in a state that both taxes and credits.

In South Carolina

Because South Carolina runs no day-count test, a snowbird can spend an extended winter in South Carolina without becoming a resident, as long as they do not develop the intent to make South Carolina their permanent home; the Department's own guidance states a nonresident spending winter months in South Carolina does not automatically become a South Carolina resident. The risk flips for someone who buys a South Carolina home, joins clubs, opens local bank accounts, and gradually shifts their center of life there, as in Brown, where the taxpayer was found domiciled in South Carolina despite lacking a South Carolina driver's license or vehicle registration that year.

In New Hampshire

New Hampshire places no day-count cap on long visitors of its own, since it has no statutory residency test. The exposure runs entirely the other way: someone who claims New Hampshire domicile to escape a high-tax origin state (most commonly Massachusetts) but still spends significant time and keeps a home in that origin state can be taxed there as a statutory resident regardless of the New Hampshire claim.

In South Carolina

South Carolina has no convenience-of-the-employer rule. A remote worker physically performing work from South Carolina owes South Carolina tax on that personal service income (since South Carolina taxes residents' personal service income regardless of source and nonresidents' South Carolina-source personal service income), and the credit for taxes paid to other states (Code § 12-6-3400) is the mechanism for avoiding double taxation if the employer's home state also asserts a claim.

In New Hampshire

New Hampshire has no convenience-of-the-employer rule (it has nothing to source, having no income tax). The real friction runs the other direction: a remote worker who moves to New Hampshire but keeps a Massachusetts-based employer needs to confirm Massachusetts is not still asserting Massachusetts-source treatment of the wages under its own COVID-era sourcing rules, which New Hampshire itself challenged (unsuccessfully, at the Supreme Court) on behalf of its residents in 2020-2021.

In South Carolina

South Carolina follows the federal Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, the Military Spouses Residency Relief Act, and the Veterans Benefits and Transition Act: a servicemember does not lose or acquire South Carolina domicile solely by being present or absent under military orders, and a spouse may elect to use the servicemember's state of residence for tax purposes regardless of when the marriage occurred. Under S.C. Regulation 117-640.2, a servicemember who entered service while domiciled in South Carolina is presumed to remain a South Carolina resident for tax purposes unless they affirmatively establish a new domicile and abandon South Carolina, even if the new state (like Texas or Florida) has no income tax.

In New Hampshire

New Hampshire follows the federal SCRA and MSRRA: a service member's home-of-record does not change solely because military orders station them in New Hampshire, and an accompanying spouse can generally elect the service member's domicile state under MSRRA. Because New Hampshire taxes no individual income, choosing it as home-of-record eliminates state income tax on military pay entirely.

In South Carolina

Charlotte Douglas (just across the North Carolina line) and smaller in-state airports mean some airline crew live in South Carolina while based elsewhere. Federal law (49 U.S.C. § 40116) limits state taxation of air carrier employees to their state of residence and, narrowly, a state where more than 50% of pay is earned; crew domiciled in South Carolina are taxed on personal service income under the state's standard resident rules.

In New Hampshire

New Hampshire has no major hub airport for airline crew, but the federal carve-out (49 U.S.C. § 40116, taxing crew wages only in the state of residence or a state where over 50% of pay is earned) combined with New Hampshire's lack of any income tax makes it, like Florida and Texas, a common domicile choice for crew based at nearby Boston Logan who want to avoid Massachusetts income tax on their wages.