New Jersey Residency

Not in the sense most people mean. There is no separate New Jersey tax charged for the act of leaving. What exists is a withholding requirement, GIT/REP, collected at the closing table when a nonresident sells New Jersey real estate, equal to the greater of 2% of the sale price or the estimated gain at the top 10.75% rate. That withholding is credited against your actual New Jersey tax bill when you file, and if you still resided in New Jersey when the deed transferred, it does not apply at all.

Selling the home removes it as evidence, but it does not automatically end exposure. Samuelsson v. Director shows New Jersey courts presume domicile continues at its last established location until a taxpayer proves both intent to abandon it and establishment of a new one; in that case, never selling the New Jersey house was decisive against the taxpayers. Selling the house, not renewing New Jersey vehicle registration, and not returning quickly all matter more than any single document like a Florida driver's license.

Not under New Jersey's own convenience of the employer rule, at least not for that reason. New Jersey's 2023 convenience rule only reaches nonresidents from states that impose their own convenience rule on New Jersey residents, currently Delaware, Nebraska, and New York. So a New York resident telecommuting for a New Jersey employer can actually be pulled the other direction, by New York's convenience rule, not New Jersey's, depending on which state's rule the facts trigger first.

It can. ANCHOR requires the property to be your principal residence as of the program's set date, so continuing to receive it on a New Jersey home while filing a nonresident return and claiming domicile elsewhere is a direct contradiction the Division of Taxation can cross-check. If you've genuinely moved, stopping ANCHOR enrollment on the New Jersey property is one of the administrative steps that supports your new residency claim.

Occasional visits are lower risk than a pattern of extended stays, but the details matter more than the visit count alone. In Samuelsson, the taxpayers' return to New Jersey within about a year, combined with never selling the house, was enough for the Tax Court to find domicile had never been abandoned. A short visit to a sold or rented-out former home is far safer than repeated stays in a house you still own and could move back into at any time.

Staying under 183 days protects you from the statutory residency test, but not necessarily from a domicile challenge if you never formally abandoned New Jersey as your true home, and it does nothing for New Jersey's separate inheritance tax exposure, which turns on domicile, not day counts. Many taxpayers assume the 183-day rule is the whole test; it is only one of two independent ways New Jersey can claim you as a resident.

Because the New Jersey Tax Court weighed what they didn't do more heavily than what they did. They never sold or rented their New Jersey home, never bought property in Florida, and returned to New Jersey within roughly a year of the claimed move. The court treated the unsold home and the quick return as stronger evidence of continuing New Jersey domicile than the Florida paperwork was evidence of a genuine new one.

Double taxation risk is real here, and it runs on New York's rule, not New Jersey's. New York's convenience of the employer rule can tax a New York resident's full salary as New York-source income even while working for a New Jersey employer, if the remote arrangement is your convenience rather than the employer's necessity. New Jersey generally taxes only the income actually earned working within New Jersey for a nonresident, so the practical conflict is usually New York claiming more than New Jersey does, not the reverse.

Yes. Despite a well-publicized 2016 proposal to end it, the New Jersey-Pennsylvania Reciprocal Personal Income Tax Agreement remains in effect. Under it, Pennsylvania residents working in New Jersey are not subject to New Jersey income tax on their wages, and New Jersey residents working in Pennsylvania are not subject to Pennsylvania income tax on their wages; each pays tax to their home state instead. It only covers employment compensation, not self-employment income or other gains.

Not automatically. New Jersey's inheritance tax turns on domicile at death, a separate legal question from income tax residency, and New Jersey courts apply the same domicile-continuity presumption to both. Someone who stopped filing New Jersey resident income tax returns years ago can still be found domiciled in New Jersey for inheritance tax purposes if they never affirmatively abandoned it, which is why estate planners treat the two questions separately even though the underlying facts overlap heavily.

It matters as a data point, not as the legal test itself. New Jersey requires new residents to get a New Jersey driver's license and register vehicles within 60 days, and hitting that deadline on time is a small piece of the same fact pattern, home, driver's license, voter registration, time actually spent, that later determines domicile. Missing it doesn't disqualify you from residency, but a pattern of never updating MVC records is exactly the kind of gap an auditor or opposing state notices.

No, New Jersey's convenience rule only applies to a New Jersey employer's nonresident employees; it does not govern how New York taxes its own employer's remote workers. As a New Jersey resident working for a New York company, you're squarely in the situation New York's convenience rule was built for: New York can tax your full salary as New York-source income unless your remote work meets the necessity exception, and you'd then claim a New Jersey resident credit for tax paid to New York to avoid full double taxation.